The table below gives a sample of generic learning activities commonly
used in learning and teaching contexts to provide a response to the question:
What can e-learning offer the practitioner? The table highlights ways
that e-learning can impact on pedagogy rather than offering a comprehensive
guide to practice, and opens up rather than closes debate around what
is effective practice that is needed to determine how, why, when and where
e-learning is best deployed.
Click on the learning activities to find out how practitioners
have used a combination of established and e-learning practice to tackle
the challenges they found in each instance. Each case study provides opportunities
to explore and evaluate the e-learning practice that evolved in response
to those challenges, enabling you to arrive at a deeper understanding
of your own practice.
|
Negotiate learning goals
|
Discussion with tutor face-to-face
identifies learning goals and appropriate options.
Practitioner
consults with and guides learner in
identifying the
most appropriate options. |
Online learning can provide an extended,
cross-institutional choice of learning options. Practitioner
facilitates learning pathway chosen by learner. |
Learners
have increasing choice over their pathways of learning. The focus
of control moves towards the learner. |
|
Explore new concepts
|
Face-to-face delivery through lectures
and group work is supported by course notes and texts.
Practitioner as expert dictates
pace and structure of course delivery. |
Interactive resources available outside
of taught session can reinforce learning and offer opportunities to
check understanding. Practitioner as
expert scopes the learning
domain and provides essential resources. |
Learners
can control the pace and place of learning. This can both support
and extend learning, providing opportunities for differentiation.
However, remote access to learning content must be available for maximum
benefit. |
|
Evaluate facts and concepts
|
Practitioner-led face-to-face sessions
are supported by print-based and audio-visual resources.
Practitioner as academic advisor creates face-to-
face activities and provides resources to develop higher order thinking
skills. |
Discussion forums
provide opportunities for peer-to-peer evaluation of online resources
outside of classroom sessions.
Practitioner as facilitator
stimulates and mediates
discussion generated by learners in reaction to online resources.
|
Every
learner engages actively in constructing their own meaning, as peer-to-peer
discussion develops learners' evaluative skills beyond classroom sessions.
|
|
Build and test theories
|
Course content is organised into component
units, supported by demonstrations of expert skills. Assessment of
learners' knowledge and skills is typically undertaken by the practitioner.
Practitioner as instructor dictates
structure of learning, demonstrates skills and assesses learners'
performance. |
Use of online resources offers
opportunities for independent learning; integrated online self-testing
quizzes provide immediate feedback and extend learners' conceptual
understanding.
Practitioner as facilitator creates and manages
resources for learners. Practitioner and learners share role of
assessors of learning. |
Blended
learning offers a mix of face-to-face and online activities to provide
a wider variety of learning opportunities. Learners can receive timely
feedback from online tests and quizzes to identify gaps in their knowledge
and understanding. |
|
Solve problems
|
Print-based problem-solving scenarios
and experiments are used to support face-to-face group work. Solutions
are assessed by practitioner. Practitioner
dictates pace and content and supervises group work. |
Online multimedia scenarios and simulations
provide 'real life' interactive learning opportunities. Solutions
can be discussed through asynchronous communication tools.
Practitioner acts as content developer and facilitator
of learning. |
Learners
work collaboratively to identify solutions and test their conceptual
understanding through peer-to-peer discussion. |
|
Share and discuss
|
Face-to-face group
work is instigated by the practitioner but is restricted by factors
of time and place.
Practitioner sets objectives for the discussion, and is more likely
to act
as monitor and assessor. |
Online discussion through chat, email
and discussion boards can develop communities of learning.
Practitioner instigates
discussion to be taken over by learners and extended beyond class
contact time. Practitioner may
still act as monitor and assessor. |
Learners
collaborate in discussion, taking increasing ownership of the task,
as the discussion extends beyond class contact time. Remote and distance
learners are able to participate on an equal footing. |
|
Apply concepts and skills
|
Classroom or homework tasks require
learners to replicate or apply what they have seen demonstrated.
Practitioner acts as coach or instructor and invites learners to apply
what they have seen demonstrated to a new context. |
Interactive whiteboards and voting
systems enable all learners to participate in self-testing activities.
Simple interactive activities acquire an element of fun.
Practitioner facilitates learning by devising
interactive learning activities. |
Effective
use of interactive functions in some technologies can engage and motivate
learners, reducing disengagement with repetitive tasks. Learners can
participate kinaesthetically to reinforce their learning. |
|
Visualise and present concepts
|
Practitioner explains concepts and
sets assignments to assess learners' understanding.
Practitioner acts as coach and
assessor. Learners improve their presentation
by responding to practitioners' feedback. |
Use of mind-mapping
and assistive software enables learners to visualise structures and
relate concepts to each other. Grammar and spell checking functions,
predictive text and read-back facilities enable all learners to improve
the expression and presentation of their ideas and knowledge. Practitioner
inducts learners in the use of software and identifies learners who
require additional one to one support. |
Learners
take more responsibility for the coherence and presentation of their
written and oral work by using assistive software to plan, check and
present their assignments. Disabled learners can use software functions
to gain a level playing field with their peers. |
|
Assessment for learning
|
Practitioner sets formative assessment
activities and provides feedback.
Practitioner acts as coach and
assessor, providing written and oral feedback. |
Online quizzes and activities enable
learners to assess their own learning. Online assessment through a
VLE can provide immediate feedback without practitioner intervention.
Practitioner devises tests and activities
and provides supporting resources. Practitioner workload in assessment
decreases. |
Online
quizzes increase participation in face-to-face sessions as learners'
confidence increases. Learners take an increasingly more active role
in assessing their own progress. |
An appropriate combination of learning activities arguably provides the
strongest benefits for learners. This is illustrated in the case study
Kemnal Technology
College - Making learning active where the Learning Activity
Management System (LAMS) provides a newly emerging technological solution
to the challenge of maximising learners’ potential.